Asia Cup ‘No Handshake’ Row: ICC rejects Pakistan’s request to remove match referee Andy Pycroft

The International Cricket Council has turned down Pakistan’s request to remove match referee Andy Pycroft from the Asia Cup. Pakistan had complained after the India–Pakistan game, saying the referee told their captain at the toss that there would be no handshake. The ICC has decided not to change officials mid‑tournament.

India’s players had also skipped post‑match handshakes, calling it a tribute to the victims of the Pahalgam terror attack and a show of support to the armed forces. Pakistan’s board took up the matter with both the ICC and the Asian Cricket Council, and even warned of a possible boycott in some media reports. The ICC response makes clear that match officials will stay as appointed.

The referee is due to officiate Pakistan’s next group game. If Pakistan play and win, they can still qualify for the Super 4 and may face India again. Event organisers are likely to clarify match‑day protocols to avoid further flashpoints, but handshakes remain a custom, not a written law.

What the ICC decision means

• No mid‑event change: The referee stays on duty for the tournament.

• Precedent avoided: Changing an official at one member board’s request would set the wrong example, so the ICC declined.

• Protocol clarity: Expect clearer guidance around presentations and post‑match movement if the teams meet again.

Why Pakistan pushed for removal

Pakistan argued the referee’s toss instruction influenced the tone of the day and said it went against the spirit of the game. They also complained that usual formalities (like exchanging team sheets) were disrupted. After India walked off without post‑match handshakes, Pakistan protested and raised the topic publicly and with officials.

India’s stance

India tied the no‑handshake to a tribute and security context, not gameplay. The Indian board has also pointed out that handshakes are a goodwill convention, not a rule. The team’s approach so far has been to play fixtures as scheduled while keeping non‑essential courtesies with Pakistan to a minimum.

What to watch next

• Pakistan’s participation: With qualification at stake, skipping a game would risk elimination and potential sanctions.

• Event communications: Organisers will likely set written protocols for toss, presentations, and post‑match movement.

• Possible rematch: If Pakistan advance, another India–Pakistan game would test how well new protocols reduce tension.